As a leading supplier of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes and cytogenetic resources for over 20 years, it’s fair to say that we’ve seen our fair share of benchtop experience here at OGT. Among the various technical challenges that our partners encounter, one of the most common is the issue of high background fluorescence in FISH assays.
High background fluorescence is more than just a nuisance – it’s a significant issue that obscures critical data, complicates interpretation and may result in erroneous conclusions. The sources of high background are varied and can stem from multiple aspects of the FISH procedure, from denaturation temperature to washing protocols.
In this blog, we’ll delve into the key factors contributing to high background in FISH assays and provide actionable strategies to help you achieve the crystal-clear results you need. Whether you’re troubleshooting your current protocol or looking to refine your technique, this guide will help you enhance the accuracy and reliability of your FISH analyses.
Proper preparation of test samples is one of the most crucial steps in achieving high-quality FISH results. The preparation process lays the foundation for the entire assay, and even minor deviations can lead to significant issues such as uneven probe binding and elevated background fluorescence.
Fixation of FFPE samples is particularly critical because it preserves the cellular architecture while maintaining the accessibility of the target DNA sequences. The fixation process is a delicate balance; both under-fixation and over-fixation can lead to a high background signal.
For best results, always use freshly prepared fixative solutions and adhere to the fixation times stated in the protocol closely. If using Carnoy’s solution for cell fixation, always use freshly prepared solution, stored at -20°C to prevent moisture absorption and maintain its effectiveness, discard the solution after use.
For blood smear slides, hypotonic solutions e.g. potassium chloride can be used during fixation to reduce background fluorescence. When using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue, we suggest aiming for sections of 3-4μm thick to avoid issues with probe penetration and interpretation.
For more tips on FISH sample preparation, visit our sample preparation FAQs
Pre-treatment assay steps, such as enzyme digestion or heat treatment, can also be a source of high background. Pre-treatment measures are often employed in FISH assays to break down proteins, lipids and other cellular components that may mask or obstruct the target DNA sequences.
Figure 1. Example FISH images of (A) Under-fixation of a blood smear, (B) Insufficient pre-treatment of FFPE tissue, (C) Under-digestion of FFPE tissue and (D) Over-digestion of FFPE tissue
For optimal results on your FFPE tissue samples we suggest you use the CytoCell® LPS 100 Tissue Pretreatment Kit. When using this kit, make sure to heat the Tissue Pretreatment Solution (Reagent 1) to 98–100°C in a water bath and maintain this temperature when you introduce your slides for at least 30 minutes (this may increase depending upon your tissue type, fixation and/or section size) before treating with enzyme at 37°C. Remember to refresh your pre-treatment solution between slide batches.
Probe volume is key in determining the success of your FISH assay, influencing the specificity and clarity of your results. Using an optimal probe volume helps to maximize specific binding between the probe and target sequence, ensuring strong signal at the target while minimizing background fluorescence.
Another important factor to consider, particularly when using FFPE tissue, is the denaturation conditions. During this step, the double-stranded DNA is unwound into single strands, allowing the probe to bind to its complementary target sequence. For FFPE samples, which are highly cross-linked following formalin fixation, using the optimal denaturation temperature and time, as stated in your FISH probe protocol, is critical to ensure probe hybridization without increasing background fluorescence.
Having issues with high background in your hematology FISH assay? Check out our specialist hematology FISH troubleshooting resource
Effective washing is a critical component of FISH assays, reducing background fluorescence by removing excess unbound or non-specifically bound probes. Washing steps must be carefully controlled to ensure that non-specifically bound probes are thoroughly removed without affecting the specific probe-target hybrids.
To minimize background fluorescence, optimize the stringency of your washes by carefully adjusting your incubation pH, temperature, and time. Begin with the recommended incubation time in the protocol and make incremental changes if background persists. Always use freshly prepared wash buffers to prevent contamination or degradation.
You might have performed your FISH assay perfectly up until now, but there remains one more obstacle that could scupper your success. The optical filter in your fluorescence microscope can be another source of weak overall signal and cloud your results.
Figure 2. An example of a damaged filter
Check your optical filters for signs of wear or damage. Extend the useful life of your optical filters by protecting them from the light source as much as possible. One way to achieve this is by closing the microscope shutter when not in use. Replace filters in line with manufacturer’s guidelines – typically every 2-4 years.
High background fluorescence is the enemy of strong FISH assay results and can be influenced by a myriad of assay parameters. By refining your sample preparation techniques, pre-treatment steps, probe volume, denaturation conditions and washes, you can significantly enhance the clarity of your FISH results and be confident in your analysis and research findings.
And so, remember to help reduce high background fluorescence:
Explore our range of CytoCell FISH probes
Still struggling with FISH assay troubleshooting? Reach out to us today to enquire about a FISH health check with our team of expert Field Application Scientists
Designing in situ probes for hybridization assays can be a tricky, time-consuming task. Read our blog to discover five tips for effective probe design!
ReadTina Stafki talks about how she got hooked on FISH early on in her career, how she uses FISH in the CellNetix pathology lab to help patients and clinicians across the Pacific Northwest, and why CytoCell® FISH probes from OGT are her first choice when it comes to FISH probes.
ReadFISH is a cytogenetic technique utilized in labs to detect chromosomal abnormalities in both cancer and constitutional specimens. In this blog learn about the advantages of FISH...
ReadCarmen Vokaty, Assistant-Chief Medical Technologist in Cytogenetics at the McGill University Health Centre, details how her lab incorporated OGT’s CytoCell® Tissue Pretreatment kit into its workflow after struggling with a homebrew solution.
ReadDr Jennie Thurston, Director of Cytogenetics, Carolinas Pathology Group, Atrium Health, explains how OGT's CytoCell® FISH probes were seamlessly incorporated into the automated workflow for fast, high quality results.
ReadDr. Theresa C. Brown, Tulane University School of Medicine, answer questions around her AGT 2017 presentation 'FISHing with the real-life laboratory experts.'
ReadMegumi Hada, PhD, Senior Research Scientist, RaISE, Prairie View, Texas A&M. answers our questions on space radiation, how it affects astronaut health, and what her research can teach us about the biological effects of radiation here on Earth.
Read