Bone marrow aspirates are a challenging sample type from which to obtain accurate and conclusive FISH results due to the low abundance of plasma cells in which the cytogenetic abnormalities would be present.
To overcome this, labs commonly incorporate the plasma cell marker CD138+ into their selection methods to enrich plasma cells before performing FISH to enhance the detection of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities. While effective in isolating the cells of interest, these extraction methods can have knock-on effects that impede probe penetration and alter cell morphology, leading to weak signals and inconclusive results. The two most frequently used methods labs use to enrich plasma cells are flow cytometry cell sorting and Magnetic Activated Cell Sorting (MACS). Each of these methods presents challenges that, if not addressed, can lead to weak signals and inconclusive results.
In this blog, we will explore common obstacles encountered in CD138+ cell selection workflows and offer practical tips to maximise success in FISH analysis, ensuring clearer signals and better probe penetration.
The MACS process for CD138+ cells can lead to a significant loss of important cell surface markers (e.g., CD71, CD11b, CD11a, CD49e, and CD69) on plasma cells.1 Similarly, CD138+ sorting by flow cytometry can also lead to a marked loss of these important cell surface markers.2
The loss of surface markers impacts downstream FISH analysis as they play key roles in the structural integrity and phenotypic characteristics of the plasma cells, which may affect probe penetration and hybridization. In some cases, plasma cell subsets can be lost entirely during sorting2. This can skew the results of downstream FISH by limiting the diversity of the plasma cell population being analysed. When plasma cells are already scarce, overlooking plasma sub-populations could mean missing important genetic abnormalities.
Both flow-based and magnetic-based cell separation methods can leave behind residual artifacts, such as antibodies or magnetic beads, which may skew FISH results in several ways. Plasma cells are naturally protein-rich, and as such, naturally pose a barrier to probe penetration. Residual artifacts exacerbate this issue by creating a physical barrier on the cell surface, further preventing FISH probes from accessing the DNA within the cells. This often results in weak or incomplete hybridization, leading to lower signal intensity and reduced sensitivity of the assay.
Residual antibodies and magnetic beads can also increase the likelihood of non-specific probe binding. The FISH probes may bind to these foreign materials instead of the target sequences, increasing background fluorescence and making it difficult to distinguish between true signals and non-specific noise.
Challenges with plasma cell enrichment are commonplace, but there are a number of strategies and workflow adjustments being discussed in the field which seek to overcome these issues. Here are some of the inside tips used by FISH experts to enhance CD138+ cell selection and FISH results:
Optimizing the enrichment and preparation of CD138+ plasma cells can boost your chances of obtaining accurate and conclusive FISH results. Experts in the field are addressing common enrichment issues posed by separation techniques, such as the loss of surface markers, residual materials and poor probe penetration, through strategic workflow adjustments.
By carefully refining CD138+ cell selection protocols, adjusting washing and fixation techniques, and optimizing probe penetration and denaturation conditions, it’s possible to improve the clarity and consistency of FISH results. Addressing these workflow challenges will help ensure that even with scarce plasma cells, your FISH analyses will yield strong, reliable signals.
View our full range of CytoCell FISH probes
Learn how to combat high background fluorescence in your FISH assays with inside tips on sample preparation, hybridization conditions and more.
ReadAt OGT we are proud of the collaborations we have with labs all over the world. In this blog discover how Norah O. Akinola, Professor of Haematology at the Obafemi Awolowo University in Nigeria, worked with OGT experts to establish a FISH laboratory by upgrading their existing cytogenetics facility.
ReadTina Stafki talks about how she got hooked on FISH early on in her career, how she uses FISH in the CellNetix pathology lab to help patients and clinicians across the Pacific Northwest, and why CytoCell® FISH probes from OGT are her first choice when it comes to FISH probes.
Read